How democratic was Andrew Jackson dbq
During Andrew Jackson’s democratic roles, mainly the expansion of voting rights and the fight won against the British, he had a lot of controversies which proved his intentions otherwise. Most of his desires were selfish and he denied other people the opportunity of participating in governments issues apart from those who supported him.
Who was Andrew Jackson? He was the seventh president of the United States (1829-1837), born in1767, and orphaned while young, he worked hard and rose to the top to leadership having good interactions with the common people. He was the basis of the Democratic-Republican Party.
As much as he had good attributes such as supporting the common man and equality beyond social class, he proved not to be democratic. Most of his enemies referred to him as a king rather than the President. His most acts were of dictatorship. He wanted to fulfill his ambitions at the expense of the American people.
He may have fought for the rights of the common poor people by shutting the national bank which only favored the rich, he did not believe in equality. His social interactions were not ideal for all people. During his reign he had slaves to himself.
He greatly supported slavery and equality only made sense when referring to white males. He discriminated the Native Americans as he felt they were more inferior to the whites. To him, these native communities were like children who did not understand what they wanted and where they were going. He then used his means of guiding them out of their lands and sending them to a trail that was unfavorable for survival.
The environment was not fit for humans as they were subjected to hunger, diseases mostly associated with cold and even death. He was not a democratic president as he thought there were people who deserved and others who were deserved.
He did not listen to reason. In most cases, he had made decision based on what he thought was right and not listening to both parties. He had relied on the support of one side, the poor and forgot the rich. For governmental jobs, he had interchanged the most experienced and educated with the illiterate farmers who had no idea how to run the affairs. He had acted unfairly as most of those he chose were his supporters.
For instance, he had chosen Swartwout because he was his earlier supporter without to listening to other people who had learnt of his behavior. During his term in the office he had taken government funds which would affect the economy and the common goods but he still forgave him. He had no good judgment when it came to his supporters. To him, they were more important than the rest.
He had hurt the American economy when he vetoed the second bank United States of America. He had believed it was going to corrupt the democracy of the people as it did not belong to the government. According to him, the banks had gained a lot of power and could overturn the economy of the U.S. He believed the rich who run the banks were a threat to his political life and national security as it was mainly run by investors who had allegiance to other governments.
His action of removing all government deposits from the bank completely handicapped them. Jackson had crossed paths with his enemies for destroying the national bank for his own personal reasons. He was once quoted saying, “the bank is going to kill me but I will kill it.” These actions later led the economy of America in trouble as he did not support the idea of paper money.
During the tariff error of 1832, the former vice president, John Calhoun had the notion that it harmed the state while benefiting the Northern manufacturing states. This was because of the protection it gave to Northerners from foreign competitors who offered affordable goods. The former vice president wanted its nullification as the constitution required. However, those from South Carolina did not adhere to the nullification rather threatened to succeed.
The president, on the other hand, embarked to signing the bill that authorized the use of force against nullification. This strategy was not welcomed as it led to hostilities between the people of the North and South.
Even though the presidency of Andrew Jackson was filled with a lot of controversies, a direct opposite to the democracy he wanted, it still had the good effects still being felt today in America. He was among the few presidents whose term had brought changes to the wellbeing of the people and the constitution.
By redefining what leadership of a country meant, he improved the foreign policy of America with respect to their rights and trade worldwide.